By Cynthia Owen Philip
Review of The End of the Country, by Seamus McGraw. Random House, June 2011, 256 pages, $26.
As readers of AboutTown may know, I have been following the labyrinthine paths surrounding the new technology of High Volume Hydraulic Fracturing in New York State for some time. Fracking, as it is now called, bores vertical wells up to a mile or more down then fans out 6 to 8 pipes laterally another mile or two. Through this extraordinary passageway it pushes millions of gallons of water laced with an unknown selection of toxic chemicals to free pockets of natural gas embedded in glacial-age shale. This new technology was brought to commercial use the global company Halliburton whose proclaimed objective is “long-term economic benefit to Halliburton.”
You can only imagine how pleased I was when AboutTown asked me to review Seamus McGraw’s The End Of Country, for it covers the onset of hydrofracking in Pennsylvania, our neighbor that is undergirt by the same ancient shale. His book has not disappointed me. Lively and personal, as well as an instructive example, it is a very good read.
The area that McGraw focuses on lies in the northeastern section of that state. Barren coal slags testify that mining coal to feed our nation’s ever increasing energy needs was once a mainstay of its economy. However, the place he zeros in on is Dimock, where he grew up pitching hay and spreading manure on a 100-acre farm. It is hardscrabble country whose poor soils gave farmers a decent living only through unremitting hard work. Nevertheless, some prospered. They were even able to send their children away to college. (McGraw was lucky enough to be one of them.) Others taught school, fixed cars and sold gas along with an occasional cup of coffee and a hotdog. Rugged independents exploited their land by making a few sales of bluestone or timber, and, when in dire straits, even small pieces of property. Hunting and fishing supplemented homegrown fruits and vegetables.
As the young sought opportunity elsewhere, the population aged. Even “transplants” who moved in tended to be retirees. It is from their point of view that McGraw tells his story. What makes it so readable is that the characters ring true both as types and as individuals. Ken Ely, an oldtimer deeply attached to his rocky acres, is stubbornly self-sufficient. A virtual hermit, his closest companion is a hound dog named Crybaby. But he is wily, intelligent and, deep-down, spunkily caring. Newcomers Vicky and Jim Switzer are retired do-it-yourselfers, who bought seven dream acres with gurgling brook and fine view. They live in a trailer while they hand-build their house. McGraw’s convent-educated mother, according to him, relishes complaining. However, seven years a comparatively well-off widow, her ultimate goal is to leave him and his two sisters free of the money worries she experienced first hand. And then there’s McGraw himself. I leave him for you to figure out.
Along come the natural gas prospectors. First, the Landmen, slick salesmen in the employ of the gas drilling companies, mostly Texans, whose sole object is lure locals into signing leases giving away the rights to the gas beneath their land for a pittance. Their pitch is bolstered by glowing promises of future riches. When they’ve met their self-imposed quotas they vanish. Young, reckless Roughnecks follow. They are so engrossed in the sport of driving enormous land levelers, tree cutters and tank trucks that they are oblivious to the environmental havoc they create as they build wide access roadways and prepare drilling pads. Smooth talking expediters wearing white Stetsons arrive in fancy cars at about the same time. They supposedly serve as go-betweens offering to deal with the increasing number landowners who find their leases baffling as they approach the gas companies. They charge sizable fees, of course, but few even intend to solve their problems.
How the locals respond to the promised riches offered them and the physical intrusions on their established way of life provide the tensions that drive this tragi-comic tale. Full of complexity and ambiguity, the drama is heightened because the consequences of their decisions will not be temporary but very long term. As engaging as reading the book was, it made me ponder what I would have done in similar circumstances.
Today I ask: Can Seamus McGraw’s aptly named The End of Country, serve as a warning to New Yorkers as we approach the advent of full-fledged hydrofracking in a large portion of our state? There is no question in my mind that reading this book would be useful, for the negative impacts in Pennsylvania increasingly demonstrate that hydrofracking, as it is now practiced, threatens the quality of our air, watercourses, aquifers and drinking water as well as our diversifiying agriculture, tourist industry, fishing, boating and, ultimately, community cohesion. It is clear that the costs in the long run may not outweigh any perceived benefits.
Unfortunately New York’s governor has been singing the hydrofracking companies’ tunes. Of the several departments involved in establishing and monitoring its operations, the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), whose staff serves at his pleasure, is the most prominent. Its outreach to the public has been woefully lacking. Not only are its documents full of indefensible generalities, they are impossible for the ordinary citizen to parse because of their extreme length, their obscure references and their egregious omissions. For instance, the over 1500-page Draft Supplemental Generic Impact Statement (DSGEIS), which the general public must digest in order to make comments, contains only one sentence on hydrofracking’s impact on the public’s physical health. Unless citizens read and question the report, they must take the DEC’s interpretation on trust—or someone else’s interpretation. Moreover there is mounting evidence that the DEC no longer wishes to interact with the general public in any helping way. Queries questioning the complete wisdom of its documents go unanswered. Meaningful interplay between the governed and those entrusted with governing is increasingly rare.
I attended the regional official hearing in Sullivan County, one of only four in the entire state at which the public could register comments on three essential documents—the DEC’s monumental DSGEIS and its highly technical regulations governing fracking operations, both released during the summer. The third, dealing with storm water overflows, produced by a different department was released only a few days before the hearings began.
I attended the hearings held in Sullivan County that is slated to become one of the first areas to undergo fracking. Not incidentally, it is the second poorest county in the state. The posted capacity of the community college auditorium in which it took place was posted at 275 persons. Municipal officials and heads of significant groups were given priority seating and spoke first, quite properly I think. The remaining seats went to those who lined up outside to get them. Once the auditorium was filled, those who failed to get in could remain outside in the wind and rain, hoping someone would leave releasing a seat, try their luck again in the line-up for the evening session or go home. Those with seats who indicated they wished to speak were given a number. One of the last to get in, mine was 87. As each speaker was given three minutes to present their comments, and the session was to last only three hours, it was obvious it would not be reached.
Today there are only two ways for people to get their opinions officially recognized: send them in via the DEC’s web site or send them by regular mail. (Go to www.dec.ny.gov/energy/76838.html.) The former is couched in uninviting terms, to put it politely, and I doubt there is much elasticity in its formula. Also note the mind-boggling “accessibility” disclaimer. The latter will cost you a postage stamp. However, either way the DEC has stated that your opinion will be recorded and you will receive some sort of a response.
At this juncture, I am hoping against hope we will be given more time to make our comments. The earlier extension from December 12 to January 11, at 5:00 pm, is not enough. Every point of view would benefit by a further extension of at least 60 days to permit calmer and more valid deliberation.
At the same time, (but not instead of) there is value in writing or telephoning or e-mailing the governor, letting him know what you think. Your comments on the proposed legislation will not be officially recognized, but such action may slow down his rush to give the oil companies the special privileges they are demanding. Contact other elected officials as well. It is time we reinstitute participatory democracy in our state. As the ancient saying goes: “It takes two hands to clap.”